Reactionary Eschatology: Conclusions

Christ and the Seven Candlesticks

"Christ and the Seven Candlesticks," a woodcut by Albrecht Dürer, from the series "The Revelation of St. John"

In this series we are discussed a simple question: Are current events or the Bible driving my theology? Over the last few days we looked at the three popular views in Eschatology and discussed the dangers in each view toward Reactionary Theology, or allowing current events to drive our theology.

Other posts in the Reactionary Eschatology series:
Intro
Premillennialism
Postmillennialism
Amillennialism

In the conclusion I would just like to share some questions that may be worth asking when trying to understand and interpret the Bible to help avoid Reactionary Theology:

Are there other views on the subject? This is hard because sometimes you don’t even know to question certain things, because you are so used to assuming them. Sometimes hanging out with people who don’t agree with you can help in this area.

Does my understanding depend on culture and current events? In Eschatology this may be easy to answer, in other topics it may be slightly more difficult. We impose our understanding of consumerism, individualism, church, baptism, communion, and many other things when we read the Bible. Check out Coffeehouse Theology for a good discussion on Contextual Theology and how to use it to your advantage as opposed to being trapped by it.

Do I believe it because it is or is not popular currently or throughout history? These are not good reasons to believe something. Popularity may be a good reason to learn more about a certain view, but never to believe it.

Do you believe it because your theological heroes or favorite pastor believes it? or maybe you don’t believe it because someone you consider a heretic believes it. Either way, again, this is no basis for beliefs.

Are you looking to The Spirit to teach you? This is the most important and, thus, last point. Without God’s Spirit the words of Scripture can do nothing for us, and our understanding is empty and meaningless. The Spirit’s guidance should be the only driving force in what we believe. There are lots of smart people out there who believe very different things. If we were not given the Spirit we would never know who or what to believe, but fortunately, whether you have a degree or never received your High School Diploma, if you are a follower of Christ then you have God’s Spirit in you to guide you into all truth.

Advertisements

About Dan Allen

Just some guy trying to figure stuff out... View all posts by Dan Allen

One response to “Reactionary Eschatology: Conclusions

  • norma j hill

    Good questions, Dan. I know that I’ve certainly “believed” things for long periods of time without really examining the reason for my “belief.”

    I can’t begin to express how glad I am that I have the Spirit of Christ to guide me – and that He never gives up pointing me to Truth, to Christ Himself.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: